Athlon XP 2000+ vs Ryzen 7 7445HS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7445HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
10.78
+9700%

Ryzen 7 7445HS outperforms Athlon XP 2000+ by a whopping 9700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8213635
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesRyzen 7000 Seriesno data
Power efficiencyno data0.17
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenamePhoenix (2023−2024)Thorton (2001−2003)
Release date3 May 2023 (2 years ago)January 2002 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$25

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7445HS and Athlon XP 2000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads121
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz1.67 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache6 MB256 KB
L3 cache16 MB0 KB
Chip lithography4 nm180 nm
Die size137 mm2150 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data63 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7445HS and Athlon XP 2000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP7, FP7r2A
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt70 Watt

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 7 7445HS 10.78
+9700%
Athlon XP 2000+ 0.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7445HS 19015
+9651%
Samples: 120
Athlon XP 2000+ 195
Samples: 53

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.78 0.11
Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 1
Chip lithography 4 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 70 Watt

Ryzen 7 7445HS has a 9700% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 4400% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 7 7445HS is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon XP 2000+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 7445HS is a notebook processor while Athlon XP 2000+ is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7445HS
Ryzen 7 7445HS
AMD Athlon XP 2000+
Athlon XP 2000+

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 21 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7445HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 45 votes

Rate Athlon XP 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 7445HS and Athlon XP 2000+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.