Ryzen 5 7640U vs Ryzen 7 6800HS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.43
+8.3%
Ryzen 5 7640U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
13.33

Ryzen 7 6800HS outperforms Ryzen 5 7640U by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 6800HS and Ryzen 5 7640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking494554
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency39.0284.10
Architecture codenameRembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023)
Release dateJanuary 2022 (2 years ago)3 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 6800HS and Ryzen 5 7640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm4 nm
Die size208 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 6800HS and Ryzen 5 7640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP7FP8
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 6800HS and Ryzen 5 7640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMERyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 6800HS and Ryzen 5 7640U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 6800HS and Ryzen 5 7640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 680MAMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 6800HS and Ryzen 5 7640U.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 6800HS 14.43
+8.3%
Ryzen 5 7640U 13.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 6800HS 22925
+8.3%
Ryzen 5 7640U 21177

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 6800HS 1821
Ryzen 5 7640U 2137
+17.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 6800HS 8681
Ryzen 5 7640U 8747
+0.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.43 13.33
Integrated graphics card 15.98 14.95
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 7 6800HS has a 8.3% higher aggregate performance score, 6.9% faster integrated GPU, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Ryzen 5 7640U, on the other hand, has a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 6800HS and Ryzen 5 7640U.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 6800HS and Ryzen 5 7640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
Ryzen 7 6800HS
AMD Ryzen 5 7640U
Ryzen 5 7640U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 187 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 6800HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 38 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7640U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 6800HS or Ryzen 5 7640U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.