Core i5-13400 vs Ryzen 7 5700X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 7 5700X
2022
8 cores / 16 threads
17.43
+7.1%
Core i5-13400
2023
10 cores / 16 threads
16.27

Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms Core i5-13400 by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Ryzen 7 5700X and Core i5-13400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking326368
Place by popularity31not in top-100
Value for money48.2065.36
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameVermeer (Zen 3)Raptor Lake-S
Release date4 April 2022 (2 years old)4 January 2023 (1 year old)
Current price$309 $207
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13400 has 36% better value for money than Ryzen 7 5700X.

Technical specs

Ryzen 7 5700X and Core i5-13400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size81 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °C72 °C
Number of transistors4,150 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 5700X and Core i5-13400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 5700X and Core i5-13400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 5700X and Core i5-13400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 5700X and Core i5-13400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 5700X and Core i5-13400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 730
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.55 GHz
Execution Unitsno data24

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 5700X and Core i5-13400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 7 5700X and Core i5-13400 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 7 5700X and Core i5-13400 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 5700X and Core i5-13400.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 5700X 17.43
+7.1%
i5-13400 16.27

Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms Core i5-13400 by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 5700X 26705
+7.2%
i5-13400 24920

Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms Core i5-13400 by 7% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 5700X 2122
i5-13400 2288
+7.8%

Core i5-13400 outperforms Ryzen 7 5700X by 8% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 5700X 9734
i5-13400 10323
+6.1%

Core i5-13400 outperforms Ryzen 7 5700X by 6% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 5700X 6527
i5-13400 8721
+33.6%

Core i5-13400 outperforms Ryzen 7 5700X by 34% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 5700X 42876
i5-13400 51095
+19.2%

Core i5-13400 outperforms Ryzen 7 5700X by 19% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 5700X 14862
+9%
i5-13400 13632

Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms Core i5-13400 by 9% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 5700X 3.39
+2.4%
i5-13400 3.47

Core i5-13400 outperforms Ryzen 7 5700X by 2% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 5700X 26
i5-13400 27
+3.4%

Core i5-13400 outperforms Ryzen 7 5700X by 3% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 5700X 2329
i5-13400 2358
+1.2%

Core i5-13400 outperforms Ryzen 7 5700X by 1% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 5700X 253
i5-13400 257
+1.6%

Core i5-13400 outperforms Ryzen 7 5700X by 2% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 5700X 2.94
i5-13400 3.1
+5.4%

Core i5-13400 outperforms Ryzen 7 5700X by 5% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 5700X 13.4
+13.6%
i5-13400 11.8

Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms Core i5-13400 by 14% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 5700X 12478
+56.4%
i5-13400 7979

Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms Core i5-13400 by 56% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 5700X 305
i5-13400 311
+2%

Core i5-13400 outperforms Ryzen 7 5700X by 2% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 5700X 135
i5-13400 136
+0.8%

Core i5-13400 outperforms Ryzen 7 5700X by 1% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 17.43 16.27
Recency 4 April 2022 4 January 2023
Physical cores 8 10

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 5700X and Core i5-13400. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 5700X and Core i5-13400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
Intel Core i5-13400
Core i5-13400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 5148 votes

Rate AMD Ryzen 7 5700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 831 vote

Rate Intel Core i5-13400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 5700X or Core i5-13400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.