FX-4130 vs Ryzen 7 5700

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 5700
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.27
+798%
FX-4130
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.70

Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms FX-4130 by a whopping 798% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 5700 and FX-4130 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4612058
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation61.020.31
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency22.231.29
Architecture codenameCezanne (2021−2024)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date4 April 2022 (2 years ago)27 August 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179$112

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 5700 has 19584% better value for money than FX-4130.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 5700 and FX-4130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache16 MBno data
Chip lithography7 nm32 nm
Die size180 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors10,700 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.2875 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 5700 and FX-4130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 5700 and FX-4130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 5700 and FX-4130 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 5700 and FX-4130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 5700 and FX-4130.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 5700 15.27
+798%
FX-4130 1.70

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • GeekBench 5 Single-Core
    • GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 5700 24256
+800%
FX-4130 2696

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 5700 2000
+383%
FX-4130 414

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 5700 8776
+723%
FX-4130 1066

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.27 1.70
Recency 4 April 2022 27 August 2012
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

Ryzen 7 5700 has a 798.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4130 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 5700 and FX-4130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 5700
Ryzen 7 5700
AMD FX-4130
FX-4130

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8
247 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5
174 votes

Rate FX-4130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 5700 or FX-4130, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.