Ryzen 5 9600X vs Ryzen 7 4800HS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 4800HS
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
11.53
Ryzen 5 9600X
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
18.98
+64.6%

Ryzen 5 9600X outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 4800HS and Ryzen 5 9600X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking681311
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.94
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Power efficiency31.0127.49
Architecture codenameRenoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)8 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 4800HS and Ryzen 5 9600X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz5.4 GHz
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm4 nm
Die size156 mm270.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Number of transistors9,800 million8,315 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 4800HS and Ryzen 5 9600X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6AM5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 4800HS and Ryzen 5 9600X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMESMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 4800HS and Ryzen 5 9600X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 4800HS and Ryzen 5 9600X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 4800HS and Ryzen 5 9600X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 4800HS 11.53
Ryzen 5 9600X 18.98
+64.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 4800HS 18321
Ryzen 5 9600X 30141
+64.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 4800HS 5705
Ryzen 5 9600X 9324
+63.4%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 4800HS 36313
Ryzen 5 9600X 54599
+50.4%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 4800HS 12785
Ryzen 5 9600X 17706
+38.5%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 7 4800HS 4.11
Ryzen 5 9600X 2.62
+56.9%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 7 4800HS 20
Ryzen 5 9600X 31
+54.8%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 4800HS 1701
Ryzen 5 9600X 2630
+54.7%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 4800HS 187
Ryzen 5 9600X 341
+82.8%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 4800HS 2.19
Ryzen 5 9600X 4
+82.6%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 7 4800HS 10.3
Ryzen 5 9600X 13.4
+30.1%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 7 4800HS 99
Ryzen 5 9600X 154
+55.6%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 7 4800HS 217
Ryzen 5 9600X 364
+68.1%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 7 4800HS 4642
Ryzen 5 9600X 14819
+219%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 4800HS 7611
Ryzen 5 9600X 12840
+68.7%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 4800HS 284
+53.9%
Ryzen 5 9600X 185

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 4800HS 1191
Ryzen 5 9600X 2507
+111%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 4800HS 4655
Ryzen 5 9600X 7760
+66.7%

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 4800HS 48392
Ryzen 5 9600X 68266
+41.1%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 4800HS 214
Ryzen 5 9600X 380
+77.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.53 18.98
Integrated graphics card 7.47 1.98
Recency 6 January 2020 8 August 2024
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 7 4800HS has 277.3% faster integrated GPU, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 9600X, on the other hand, has a 64.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 9600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 4800HS in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 4800HS is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 9600X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 4800HS and Ryzen 5 9600X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
Ryzen 7 4800HS
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
Ryzen 5 9600X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 265 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 4800HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 189 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 9600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 4800HS or Ryzen 5 9600X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.