Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U vs Ryzen 7 4800H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 4800H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 54 Watt
12.00
+46.2%

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 4800H and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking599863
Place by popularity85not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Architecture codenameRenoir-H (Zen 2)Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)7 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$1141 no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 4800H and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm
Die size156 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors9800 Million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 4800H and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6FP6
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 4800H and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 4800H and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 4800H and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/s68.27 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 4800H and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U.

PCIe version3.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 4800H 12.00
+46.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 8.21

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U by 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 4800H 18561
+46.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 12698

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U by 46% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 4800H 1468
+12.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 1303

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U by 13% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 4800H 5993
+30.1%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 4607

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U by 30% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 4800H 5684
+7.5%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 5289

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U by 7% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 4800H 37276
+35.3%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 27559

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U by 35% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 4800H 12683
+24.6%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 10182

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U by 25% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 4800H 21
+63.1%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 13

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U by 63% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 4800H 1854
+59.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 1161

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U by 60% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 4800H 188
+7.4%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 175

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U by 7% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 4800H 2.18
+7.9%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 2.02

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U by 8% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 4800H 10.3
+90.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 5.4

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U by 91% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 4800H 4601
+21.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 3795

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U by 21% in WinRAR 4.0.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.00 8.21
Integrated graphics card 7.43 6.25
Recency 6 January 2020 7 May 2020
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 7 4800H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 4800H and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
Ryzen 7 4800H
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3130 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 4800H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 146 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 4800H or Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.