Core i5-1130G7 vs Ryzen 7 3750H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 3750H
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
5.26
Core i5-1130G7
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.61
+6.7%

Core i5-1130G7 outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-1130G7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking11211077
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7Intel Tiger Lake
Architecture codenamePicasso (Zen+)Tiger Lake-UP4
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)2 September 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$1042 no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-1130G7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.3 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm10 nm SuperFin
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4500 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-1130G7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FCBGA1598
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-1130G7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-1130G7 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-1130G7 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-1130G7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 10Intel® Iris® Xe Graphics
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz
Execution Unitsno data80

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-1130G7 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-1130G7 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-1130G7 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-1130G7.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 3750H 5.26
i5-1130G7 5.61
+6.7%

Core i5-1130G7 outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 3750H 8134
i5-1130G7 8681
+6.7%

Core i5-1130G7 outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 7% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 3750H 4770
i5-1130G7 7813
+63.8%

Core i5-1130G7 outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 64% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 3750H 20687
i5-1130G7 25385
+22.7%

Core i5-1130G7 outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 23% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 3750H 7431
+33.4%
i5-1130G7 5569

Ryzen 7 3750H outperforms Core i5-1130G7 by 33% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 3750H 7.44
+41.9%
i5-1130G7 10.56

Core i5-1130G7 outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 42% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 3750H 9
+20.5%
i5-1130G7 8

Ryzen 7 3750H outperforms Core i5-1130G7 by 21% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 3750H 734
+19.1%
i5-1130G7 617

Ryzen 7 3750H outperforms Core i5-1130G7 by 19% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 3750H 144
i5-1130G7 179
+24.3%

Core i5-1130G7 outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 24% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 3750H 1.64
i5-1130G7 2.18
+32.9%

Core i5-1130G7 outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 33% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 3750H 5
+92.3%
i5-1130G7 2.6

Ryzen 7 3750H outperforms Core i5-1130G7 by 92% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 3750H 2866
i5-1130G7 4785
+67%

Core i5-1130G7 outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 67% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 3750H 49
+60.9%
i5-1130G7 30

Ryzen 7 3750H outperforms Core i5-1130G7 by 61% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 3750H 139
i5-1130G7 146
+4.4%

Core i5-1130G7 outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 4% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.26 5.61
Recency 6 January 2019 2 September 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-1130G7.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-1130G7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
Ryzen 7 3750H
Intel Core i5-1130G7
Core i5-1130G7

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1296 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3750H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 25 votes

Rate Core i5-1130G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 3750H or Core i5-1130G7, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.