Opteron 1352 (B2) vs Ryzen 7 2800H
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1415 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 13.05 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (Zen) (2018) | Budapest (2008) |
| Release date | 30 May 2018 (7 years ago) | 3 June 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $209 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 2800H and Opteron 1352 (B2) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Multiplier | 33 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128K (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | 285 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4950 Million | 463 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 2800H and Opteron 1352 (B2) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FP5 | AM2+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2800H and Opteron 1352 (B2). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2800H and Opteron 1352 (B2) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2800H and Opteron 1352 (B2). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1300 MHz) | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2800H and Opteron 1352 (B2).
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 May 2018 | 3 June 2008 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Ryzen 7 2800H has an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 7 2800H and AMD Opteron 1352 (B2). We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 2800H is a notebook processor while Opteron 1352 (B2) is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
