Atom x5-E3940 vs Ryzen 7 2800H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 2800H
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.18
+314%

Ryzen 7 2800H outperforms Atom x5-E3940 by a whopping 314% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 2800H and Atom x5-E3940 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking11332212
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 75x Intel Atom
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (Zen)Apollo Lake (2016)
Release date30 May 2018 (6 years ago)30 August 2014 (9 years ago)
Current priceno data$546

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 2800H and Atom x5-E3940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data103 °C
Number of transistors4500 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 2800H and Atom x5-E3940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP5Intel BGA 1296
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2800H and Atom x5-E3940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 2800H and Atom x5-E3940 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2800H and Atom x5-E3940 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2800H and Atom x5-E3940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11Intel HD Graphics 500

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2800H and Atom x5-E3940.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes124

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 2800H 5.18
+314%
Atom x5-E3940 1.25

Ryzen 7 2800H outperforms Atom x5-E3940 by 314% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 2800H 8013
+313%
Atom x5-E3940 1941

Ryzen 7 2800H outperforms Atom x5-E3940 by 313% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.18 1.25
Integrated graphics card 5.49 0.75
Recency 30 May 2018 30 August 2014
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

The Ryzen 7 2800H is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E3940 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2800H and Atom x5-E3940, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 2800H
Ryzen 7 2800H
Intel Atom x5-E3940
Atom x5-E3940

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 13 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2800H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x5-E3940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 2800H or Atom x5-E3940, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.