Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U vs Ryzen 7 2700X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 2700X
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
11.33
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
12.42
+9.6%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking646578
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.79no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2020)Barcelo-U Refresh
Release date13 April 2018 (6 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329no data
Current price$171 (0.5x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache768 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm
Die size213 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors4800 Million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 2700X 11.33
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 12.42
+9.6%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 2700X 17526
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 19213
+9.6%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 10% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 2700X 1247
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 1588
+27.3%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 27% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 2700X 6099
+5.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 5800

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U by 5% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 2700X 5256
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 6108
+16.2%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 16% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 2700X 34763
+3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 33735

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U by 3% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 2700X 10643
+21.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 8758

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U by 22% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 2700X 3.48
+200%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 10.43

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 200% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 2700X 19
+6.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 18

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U by 6% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 2700X 1762
+0.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 1756

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 2700X 176
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 229
+30.3%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 30% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 2700X 1.95
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 2.68
+37.4%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 37% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 2700X 10.6
+152%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 4.2

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U by 152% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 2700X 4779
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 5274
+10.4%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 10% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 2700X 105
+10%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 95

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U by 10% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 2700X 227
+2.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 221

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U by 3% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.33 12.42
Recency 13 April 2018 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 15 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U.

Note that Ryzen 7 2700X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2750 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 2700X or Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.