Ryzen 3 5300U vs Ryzen 7 2700X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 7 2700X
2018
8 cores / 16 threads
11.33
+80.7%

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 3 5300U by an impressive 81% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 3 5300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking623986
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.76no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Lucienne (Zen 2, Ryzen 5000)
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2020)Lucienne-U (Zen 2)
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329no data
Current price$162 (0.5x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 3 5300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.35 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm
Die size192 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 3 5300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 3 5300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 3 5300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 3 5300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 3 5300U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 2700X 11.33
+80.7%
Ryzen 3 5300U 6.27

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 3 5300U by 81% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 2700X 17532
+80.8%
Ryzen 3 5300U 9695

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 3 5300U by 81% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 2700X 1246
+1.6%
Ryzen 3 5300U 1226

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 3 5300U by 2% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 2700X 6105
+68.5%
Ryzen 3 5300U 3624

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 3 5300U by 68% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 2700X 5256
+2.7%
Ryzen 3 5300U 5118

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 3 5300U by 3% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 2700X 34763
+57%
Ryzen 3 5300U 22139

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 3 5300U by 57% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 2700X 10643
+34.2%
Ryzen 3 5300U 7931

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 3 5300U by 34% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 2700X 19
+101%
Ryzen 3 5300U 9

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 3 5300U by 101% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 2700X 1762
+94.5%
Ryzen 3 5300U 906

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 3 5300U by 94% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 2700X 176
+3.4%
Ryzen 3 5300U 170

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 3 5300U by 3% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 2700X 1.95
+3.2%
Ryzen 3 5300U 1.89

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 3 5300U by 3% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 2700X 10.6
+108%
Ryzen 3 5300U 5.1

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 3 5300U by 108% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 2700X 4779
+87.3%
Ryzen 3 5300U 2551

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 3 5300U by 87% in WinRAR 4.0.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.33 6.27
Recency 19 April 2018 12 January 2021
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 7 2700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 5300U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 2700X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 5300U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 3 5300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
Ryzen 3 5300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2709 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1847 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 5300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 2700X or Ryzen 3 5300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.