EPYC Embedded 3401 vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 909 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.85 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 10.11 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 19 April 2018 (7 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC Embedded 3401 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.35 GHz | 1.85 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 37 | 18.5 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 1536 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 9600 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC Embedded 3401 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC Embedded 3401. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC Embedded 3401 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC Embedded 3401. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 1 TiB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | 85.33 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC Embedded 3401.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 April 2018 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 85 Watt |
Ryzen 7 2700X has an age advantage of 1 month, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
EPYC Embedded 3401, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and 23.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and AMD EPYC Embedded 3401. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 7 2700X is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 3401 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
