EPYC 9645 vs Ryzen 7 2700X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC 9645 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking709not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.27no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency9.93no data
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Turin (2024)
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329$11,048

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC 9645 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)96
Threads16192
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.35 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm3 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC 9645 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC 9645. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC 9645 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC 9645. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC 9645.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 April 2018 10 October 2024
Physical cores 8 96
Threads 16 192
Chip lithography 12 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 320 Watt

Ryzen 7 2700X has 204.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9645, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC 9645. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 7 2700X is a desktop processor while EPYC 9645 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC 9645, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD EPYC 9645
EPYC 9645

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2995 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 2700X or EPYC 9645, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.