EPYC 7303 vs Ryzen 7 2700X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 2700X
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
11.02
EPYC 7303
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 130 Watt
17.99
+63.2%

EPYC 7303 outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC 7303 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking709342
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.3322.37
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency9.9313.10
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)5 September 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329$604

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7303 has 140% better value for money than Ryzen 7 2700X.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC 7303 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.35 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm
Die size192 mm22x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million8,300 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC 7303 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC 7303. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC 7303 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC 7303. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC 7303.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 2700X 11.02
EPYC 7303 17.99
+63.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 2700X 17511
EPYC 7303 28572
+63.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.02 17.99
Recency 19 April 2018 5 September 2023
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 130 Watt

Ryzen 7 2700X has 23.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7303, on the other hand, has a 63.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7303 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 2700X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 2700X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7303 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700X and EPYC 7303, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD EPYC 7303
EPYC 7303

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2962 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7303 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 2700X or EPYC 7303, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.