Ultra 5 336H vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 5 336H outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 929 | 753 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.38 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.01 | 20.05 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Panther Lake (2026) |
| Release date | 13 April 2018 (7 years ago) | 5 January 2026 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 2700X and Core Ultra 5 336H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 4 |
| Efficient-cores | no data | 4 |
| Low Power Efficient-cores | no data | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.35 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 37 | no data |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 2.5 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 18 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4800 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 2700X and Core Ultra 5 336H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2540 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Core Ultra 5 336H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | - | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 2700X and Core Ultra 5 336H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Core Ultra 5 336H are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Core Ultra 5 336H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | LPDDR5X-8533, DDR5-7200 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | Intel® Graphics |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | - | 2.3 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 2700X and Core Ultra 5 336H integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | - | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Core Ultra 5 336H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over eDP | - | 3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | - | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Core Ultra 5 336H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | - | DirectX 12 Ultimate |
| OpenGL | - | 4.6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Core Ultra 5 336H.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.96 | 11.87 |
| Recency | 13 April 2018 | 5 January 2026 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 12 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 25 Watt |
Ryzen 7 2700X has 33.3% more threads.
Ultra 5 336H, on the other hand, has a 19.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 50% more physical cores, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 320% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 7 2700X is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 5 336H is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
