Xeon Gold 6252 vs Ryzen 7 2700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 2700
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.16
Xeon Gold 6252
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 150 Watt
17.55
+72.7%

Xeon Gold 6252 outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 2700 and Xeon Gold 6252 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking709333
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.5817.92
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7Intel Xeon Gold
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2020)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299$3,655
Current price$177 (0.6x MSRP)$1088 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 2700 has 9% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6252.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 2700 and Xeon Gold 6252 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1648
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache96K (per core)1.5 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)24 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)35.75 MB
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data86 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 2700 and Xeon Gold 6252 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)4 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Xeon Gold 6252. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 2700 and Xeon Gold 6252 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Xeon Gold 6252 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Xeon Gold 6252. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-2933
Maximum memory size64 GB1 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Xeon Gold 6252.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2048

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 2700 10.16
Xeon Gold 6252 17.55
+72.7%

Xeon Gold 6252 outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 2700 15708
Xeon Gold 6252 27148
+72.8%

Xeon Gold 6252 outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 73% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.16 17.55
Recency 19 April 2018 2 April 2019
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 16 48
Cost $299 $3655
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 150 Watt

The Xeon Gold 6252 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 2700 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 2700 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6252 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700 and Xeon Gold 6252, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 7 2700
Intel Xeon Gold 6252
Xeon Gold 6252

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2907 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 8 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6252 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 2700 or Xeon Gold 6252, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.