Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Ryzen 7 2700

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 2700
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.15
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
54.15
+433%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by a whopping 433% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking71022
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.688.75
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2020)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)14 July 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299$5,500
Current price$183 (0.6x MSRP)$4790 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 2700 has 113% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads16128
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)256 MB
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm
Die size192 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4sWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s204.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card--

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 2700 10.15
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 54.15
+433%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 433% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 2700 15706
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 83761
+433%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 433% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 2700 1113
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 1602
+43.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 44% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 2700 5492
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 14568
+165%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 165% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 2700 4505
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 5596
+24.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 24% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 2700 31385
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 52743
+68.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 68% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 2700 9475
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 16656
+75.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 76% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 2700 5.14
+18.9%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 6.11

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 19% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 2700 17
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 54
+225%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 225% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 2700 1551
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 9706
+526%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 526% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 2700 161
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 195
+21.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 21% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 2700 1.78
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 2.12
+19.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 19% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 2700 9
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 26
+189%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 189% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 2700 4440
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 6689
+50.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 51% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 2700 90
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 193
+115%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 115% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 2700 196
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 264
+34.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 35% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.15 54.15
Recency 19 April 2018 14 July 2020
Physical cores 8 64
Threads 16 128
Cost $299 $5500
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 280 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 2700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 7 2700
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2895 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 822 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 2700 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.