Athlon X4 840 vs Ryzen 7 2700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 2700
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.16
+373%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Athlon X4 840 by a whopping 373% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 2700 and Athlon X4 840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking7091782
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.597.38
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 74x Athlon
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2020)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)August 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299no data
Current price$177 (0.6x MSRP)$23

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 2700 has 165% better value for money than Athlon X4 840.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 2700 and Athlon X4 840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)256K
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography12 nm28 nm
Die size192 mm2245 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 2700 and Athlon X4 840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4Socket FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Athlon X4 840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Athlon X4 840 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Athlon X4 840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Athlon X4 840.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 2700 10.16
+373%
Athlon X4 840 2.15

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Athlon X4 840 by 373% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 2700 15708
+373%
Athlon X4 840 3319

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Athlon X4 840 by 373% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 2700 1114
+147%
Athlon X4 840 451

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Athlon X4 840 by 147% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 2700 5495
+391%
Athlon X4 840 1119

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Athlon X4 840 by 391% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.16 2.15
Recency 19 April 2018 on August 2014
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm

The Ryzen 7 2700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 840 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700 and Athlon X4 840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 7 2700
AMD Athlon X4 840
Athlon X4 840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2906 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 577 votes

Rate Athlon X4 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 2700 or Athlon X4 840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.