Ryzen 7 5825C vs Ryzen 7 1800X
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms Ryzen 7 5825C by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 803 | 915 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.74 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) |
| Power efficiency | 10.25 | 56.21 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 22 February 2017 (8 years ago) | 5 May 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 1800X and Ryzen 7 5825C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 36 | no data |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16384 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4800 Million | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 1800X and Ryzen 7 5825C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1800X and Ryzen 7 5825C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | FMA3 | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| XFR | + | - |
| SenseMI | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1800X and Ryzen 7 5825C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1800X and Ryzen 7 5825C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1800X and Ryzen 7 5825C.
| PCIe version | n/a | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.19 | 8.82 |
| Recency | 22 February 2017 | 5 May 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 7 1800X has a 15.5% higher aggregate performance score.
Ryzen 7 5825C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 7 1800X is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 5825C in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 7 1800X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 5825C is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
