Athlon XP-M 2200+ vs Ryzen 7 1800X
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 975 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.65 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | AMD Athlon XP-M |
| Power efficiency | 4.13 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Barton (2001−2004) |
| Release date | 2 March 2017 (8 years ago) | 19 July 2004 (21 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $97 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 1800X and Athlon XP-M 2200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 1.67 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 36 | 12.5 |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 16384 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 101 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 54 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 1800X and Athlon XP-M 2200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 27 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1800X and Athlon XP-M 2200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | FMA3 | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| XFR | + | - |
| SenseMI | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1800X and Athlon XP-M 2200+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1800X and Athlon XP-M 2200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1800X and Athlon XP-M 2200+.
| PCIe version | n/a | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 March 2017 | 19 July 2004 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 27 Watt |
Ryzen 7 1800X has an age advantage of 12 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon XP-M 2200+, on the other hand, has 251.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 7 1800X and AMD Athlon XP-M 2200+. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 7 1800X is a desktop processor while Athlon XP-M 2200+ is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
