A6-4400M vs Ryzen 7 1800X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 1800X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
10.59
+1529%

Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms A6-4400M by a whopping 1529% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 1800X and A6-4400M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking6852650
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.84no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD A-Series
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date2 March 2017 (7 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499no data
Current price$182 (0.4x MSRP)$95

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1800X and A6-4400M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache768 KB96 KB
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB (shared)
L3 cache16384 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size192 mm2246 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1800X and A6-4400M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1800X and A6-4400M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMAFMA3+
AVX++
XFR+no data
SenseMI+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1800X and A6-4400M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1800X and A6-4400M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4unknown
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon HD 7520G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1800X and A6-4400M.

PCIe versionn/ano data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 1800X 10.59
+1529%
A6-4400M 0.65

Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms A6-4400M by 1529% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 1800X 16380
+1522%
A6-4400M 1010

Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms A6-4400M by 1522% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 1800X 1133
+262%
A6-4400M 313

Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms A6-4400M by 262% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 1800X 5712
+1328%
A6-4400M 400

Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms A6-4400M by 1328% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 1800X 5062
+121%
A6-4400M 2292

Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms A6-4400M by 121% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 1800X 32833
+864%
A6-4400M 3407

Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms A6-4400M by 864% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 1800X 9585
+431%
A6-4400M 1804

Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms A6-4400M by 431% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 1800X 4.6
+918%
A6-4400M 46.82

A6-4400M outperforms Ryzen 7 1800X by 918% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 1800X 18
+1493%
A6-4400M 1

Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms A6-4400M by 1493% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 1800X 1.79
+124%
A6-4400M 0.8

Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms A6-4400M by 124% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 1800X 9.7
+1370%
A6-4400M 0.7

Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms A6-4400M by 1370% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 1800X 3967
+193%
A6-4400M 1353

Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms A6-4400M by 193% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 1800X 84
+1007%
A6-4400M 8

Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms A6-4400M by 1007% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 1800X 179
+361%
A6-4400M 39

Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms A6-4400M by 361% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.59 0.65
Recency 2 March 2017 15 May 2012
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen 7 1800X is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-4400M in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 1800X is a desktop processor while A6-4400M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1800X and A6-4400M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
Ryzen 7 1800X
AMD A6-4400M
A6-4400M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 332 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 173 votes

Rate A6-4400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 1800X or A6-4400M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.