Xeon Platinum 8280 vs Ryzen 7 1700X
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8280 outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by a whopping 136% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 961 | 315 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.03 | 0.85 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | Intel Xeon Platinum |
| Power efficiency | 3.96 | 4.32 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) |
| Release date | 2 March 2017 (8 years ago) | 11 December 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $10,009 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 7 1700X has 256% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8280.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 1700X and Xeon Platinum 8280 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 34 | 27 |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16384 KB | 38.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 84 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 8,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 1700X and Xeon Platinum 8280 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Xeon Platinum 8280. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | FMA3 | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| XFR | + | - |
| SenseMI | + | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 1700X and Xeon Platinum 8280 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Xeon Platinum 8280 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Xeon Platinum 8280. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 140.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Xeon Platinum 8280.
| PCIe version | n/a | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 48 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.89 | 20.96 |
| Recency | 2 March 2017 | 11 December 2018 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 28 |
| Threads | 16 | 56 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 205 Watt |
Ryzen 7 1700X has 115.8% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8280, on the other hand, has a 135.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads.
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 7 1700X is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8280 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
