Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 7 1700X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 1700X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
10.13
+27.6%

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 5 1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking712882
Place by popularitynot in top-10051
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.5813.43
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date22 February 2017 (7 years ago)16 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399$219
Current price$252 (0.6x MSRP)$115 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 1600 has 57% better value for money than Ryzen 7 1700X.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 5 1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache768 KB576 KB
L2 cache4096 KB3 MB
L3 cache16384 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2213 mm2
Number of transistors4800 Million4800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 5 1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 5 1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMAFMA3no data
AVX++
XFR+no data
SenseMI+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 5 1600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 5 1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card--

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 5 1600.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 1700X 10.13
+27.6%
Ryzen 5 1600 7.94

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 1700X 15673
+27.6%
Ryzen 5 1600 12283

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 28% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 1700X 1090
+1.8%
Ryzen 5 1600 1071

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 2% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 1700X 5593
+22%
Ryzen 5 1600 4586

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 22% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 1700X 4662
+2.7%
Ryzen 5 1600 4538

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 3% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 1700X 31950
+23%
Ryzen 5 1600 25970

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 23% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 1700X 9076
+10.1%
Ryzen 5 1600 8244

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 10% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 1700X 4.89
+40.1%
Ryzen 5 1600 6.85

Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by 40% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 1700X 17
+34.8%
Ryzen 5 1600 13

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 35% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 1700X 1537
+36.1%
Ryzen 5 1600 1129

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 36% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 1700X 154
+4.8%
Ryzen 5 1600 147

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 5% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 1700X 1.73
+4.8%
Ryzen 5 1600 1.65

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 5% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 1700X 9
+39.8%
Ryzen 5 1600 6.4

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 40% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 1700X 3728
+8.7%
Ryzen 5 1600 3430

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 9% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 1700X 90
+31.1%
Ryzen 5 1600 69

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 31% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 1700X 180
+1.7%
Ryzen 5 1600 177

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 2% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Ryzen 7 1700X 19631
+21.1%
Ryzen 5 1600 16217

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 21% in Geekbench 2.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Ryzen 7 1700X 20294
+34.4%
Ryzen 5 1600 15096

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 34% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Ryzen 7 1700X 4184
+14.6%
Ryzen 5 1600 3652

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 15% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.13 7.94
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Cost $399 $219
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 7 1700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 1600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 5 1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Ryzen 7 1700X
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 1600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 707 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 5514 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 1700X or Ryzen 5 1600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.