Ultra 9 285T vs Ryzen 7 1700X

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 1700X and Core Ultra 9 285T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking777not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.53no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency9.82no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date22 February 2017 (7 years ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$399no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700X and Core Ultra 9 285T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache768 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache16384 KB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size213 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors4800 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700X and Core Ultra 9 285T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM41851
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Core Ultra 9 285T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA3-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
XFR+-
SenseMI+-

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 1700X and Core Ultra 9 285T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Core Ultra 9 285T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Core Ultra 9 285T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Core Ultra 9 285T.

PCIe versionn/a5.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 8 24
Threads 16 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Ultra 9 285T has 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 1700X and Core Ultra 9 285T. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1700X and Core Ultra 9 285T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Ryzen 7 1700X
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T
Core Ultra 9 285T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 736 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 9 285T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 1700X or Core Ultra 9 285T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.