Xeon Platinum 8462Y+ vs Ryzen 7 1700
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 815 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.02 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | no data |
Power efficiency | 13.58 | no data |
Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
Release date | 22 February 2017 (7 years ago) | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | $5,945 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
Threads | 16 | 64 |
Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 30 | no data |
L1 cache | 768 KB | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 2 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 16384 KB | 60 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 213 mm2 | 4x 477 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 81 °C |
Number of transistors | 4800 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
Socket | AM4 | 4677 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 300 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | FMA3 | - |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
SenseMI | + | - |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y+ are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5-4800 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y+.
PCIe version | n/a | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | 80 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 22 February 2017 | 10 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 8 | 32 |
Threads | 16 | 64 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 300 Watt |
Ryzen 7 1700 has 361.5% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8462Y+, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y+. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 7 1700 is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8462Y+ is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.