Xeon Phi 7290 vs Ryzen 7 1700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 1700
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
8.37
Xeon Phi 7290
2016
72 cores / 288 threads, 245 Watt
10.10
+20.7%

Xeon Phi 7290 outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1006876
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.28no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency5.481.75
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Knights Landing (2016)
Release date2 March 2017 (8 years ago)20 June 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Phi 7290 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)72 (Doheptaconta-Core)
Threads16288
Base clock speed3 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache768 KB32 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16384 KB0 KB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Phi 7290 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM43647
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt245 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Phi 7290. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA3-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
SenseMI+-

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Phi 7290 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Phi 7290 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Phi 7290. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Phi 7290.

PCIe versionn/ano data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 7 1700 8.37
Xeon Phi 7290 10.10
+20.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 7 1700 14783
Samples: 5427
Xeon Phi 7290 17839
+20.7%
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.37 10.10
Recency 2 March 2017 20 June 2016
Physical cores 8 72
Threads 16 288
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 245 Watt

Ryzen 7 1700 has an age advantage of 8 months, and 276.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon Phi 7290, on the other hand, has a 20.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 800% more physical cores and 1700% more threads.

The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 1700 is a desktop processor while Xeon Phi 7290 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
Intel Xeon Phi 7290
Xeon Phi 7290

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1732 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 42 votes

Rate Xeon Phi 7290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Phi 7290, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.