Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Ryzen 7 1700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 1700
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.32
+59.9%
Xeon E5-2620 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
5.83

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v4 by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon E5-2620 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8221125
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.953.37
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7Intel Xeon E5
Power efficiency13.576.49
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date2 March 2017 (7 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329$417

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 1700 has 17% better value for money than Xeon E5-2620 v4.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon E5-2620 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s2 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3021
L1 cache768 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KB2 MB
L3 cache16384 KB20 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2246.24 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data74 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million3200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon E5-2620 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon E5-2620 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMAFMA3-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
SenseMI+-

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon E5-2620 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon E5-2620 v4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon E5-2620 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size64 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s68.3 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon E5-2620 v4.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanes2040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 1700 9.32
+59.9%
Xeon E5-2620 v4 5.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 1700 14808
+59.9%
Xeon E5-2620 v4 9259

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 1700 1025
+21.3%
Xeon E5-2620 v4 845

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 1700 5200
+16.2%
Xeon E5-2620 v4 4474

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.32 5.83
Recency 2 March 2017 20 June 2016
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 85 Watt

Ryzen 7 1700 has a 59.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and 30.8% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 1700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2620 v4 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 1700 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2620 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon E5-2620 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
Xeon E5-2620 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1541 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 100 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 1700 or Xeon E5-2620 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.