Xeon 6710E vs Ryzen 7 1700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 1700
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
8.42
Xeon 6710E
2024
64 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
34.94
+315%

Xeon 6710E outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by a whopping 315% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking985110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.2912.98
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency5.477.20
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Sierra Forest (2024)
Release date2 March 2017 (8 years ago)3 June 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329$2,749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6710E has 295% better value for money than Ryzen 7 1700.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon 6710E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads1664
Base clock speed3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache768 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB4 MB (per module)
L3 cache16384 KB96 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon 6710E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon 6710E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMAFMA3-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
SenseMI+-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon 6710E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon 6710E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon 6710E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon 6710E.

PCIe versionn/a5.0
PCI Express lanes2088

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 7 1700 8.42
Xeon 6710E 34.94
+315%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 7 1700 14794
Samples: 5362
Xeon 6710E 61404
+315%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.42 34.94
Recency 2 March 2017 3 June 2024
Physical cores 8 64
Threads 16 64
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 205 Watt

Ryzen 7 1700 has 215.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6710E, on the other hand, has a 315% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6710E is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 1700 is a desktop processor while Xeon 6710E is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
Intel Xeon 6710E
Xeon 6710E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1719 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon 6710E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon 6710E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.