Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Ryzen 7 1700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 1700
2017, $329
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
8.38
+1424%
Athlon 64 FX-74
2006, $500
2 cores / 2 threads, 125 Watt
0.55

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Athlon 64 FX-74 by a whopping 1424% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10083067
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.280.01
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency5.480.19
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date2 March 2017 (8 years ago)November 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329$500

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 1700 has 32700% better value for money than Athlon 64 FX-74.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon 64 FX-74 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache768 KB128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB
L3 cache16384 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm90 nm
Die size192 mm2235 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon 64 FX-74 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4F
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon 64 FX-74. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA3-
AVX+-
SenseMI+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon 64 FX-74 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon 64 FX-74. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR1
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon 64 FX-74.

PCIe versionn/ano data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 7 1700 8.38
+1424%
Athlon 64 FX-74 0.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 7 1700 14776
+1420%
Samples: 5436
Athlon 64 FX-74 972
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.38 0.55
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

Ryzen 7 1700 has a 1423.6% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
AMD Athlon 64 FX-74
Athlon 64 FX-74

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1732 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-74 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon 64 FX-74, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.