PRO A6-9500E vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
8.28
+660%

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U outperforms PRO A6-9500E by a whopping 660% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and PRO A6-9500E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9252406
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Power efficiency50.232.83
Architecture codenameRenoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date7 May 2020 (4 years ago)3 October 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and PRO A6-9500E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm28 nm
Die size156 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistors9,800 million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and PRO A6-9500E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and PRO A6-9500E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsPRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and PRO A6-9500E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and PRO A6-9500E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and PRO A6-9500E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and PRO A6-9500E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and PRO A6-9500E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 8.28
+660%
PRO A6-9500E 1.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 12644
+661%
PRO A6-9500E 1662

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.28 1.09
Recency 7 May 2020 3 October 2016
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U has a 659.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A6-9500E in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is a notebook processor while PRO A6-9500E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and PRO A6-9500E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
AMD PRO A6-9500E
PRO A6-9500E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 185 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate PRO A6-9500E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U or PRO A6-9500E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.