i7-8560U vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Core i7-8560U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 948 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) | no data |
Power efficiency | 49.90 | no data |
Architecture codename | Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) |
Release date | 7 May 2020 (4 years ago) | 1 October 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Core i7-8560U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 12 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
Multiplier | 21 | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 156 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 9,800 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Core i7-8560U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FP6 | Intel BGA 1528 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Core i7-8560U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Core i7-8560U are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Core i7-8560U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3, DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 68.27 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Core i7-8560U.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 6.04 | 2.67 |
Recency | 7 May 2020 | 1 October 2018 |
Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
Threads | 12 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U has 126.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Core i7-8560U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Core i7-8560U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.