Celeron G6900TE vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
8.20
+436%

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U outperforms Celeron G6900TE by a whopping 436% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Celeron G6900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking8662040
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Architecture codenameRenoir-U PRO (Zen 2)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date7 May 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Celeron G6900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm10 nm
Die size156 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors9,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Celeron G6900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP61700
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Celeron G6900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSXno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Celeron G6900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Celeron G6900TE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Celeron G6900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)Intel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Celeron G6900TE.

PCIe version3.05.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 8.20
+436%
Celeron G6900TE 1.53

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U outperforms Celeron G6900TE by 436% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 12688
+435%
Celeron G6900TE 2373

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U outperforms Celeron G6900TE by 435% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.20 1.53
Recency 7 May 2020 4 January 2022
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G6900TE in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900TE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Celeron G6900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Intel Celeron G6900TE
Celeron G6900TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 147 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 9 votes

Rate Celeron G6900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U or Celeron G6900TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.