Ryzen 5 5600G vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.17
Ryzen 5 5600G
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
12.51
+23%

Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Ryzen 5 5600G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking759610
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data28.09
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency14.8118.21
Architecture codenameRenoir (2020−2023)Cezanne (2021−2024)
Release date21 July 2020 (4 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$259

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Ryzen 5 5600G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.4 GHz
Multiplier3739
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm
Die size156 mm2AM4 (1331) mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °C95 °C
Number of transistors9,800 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Ryzen 5 5600G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Ryzen 5 5600G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Ryzen 5 5600G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Ryzen 5 5600G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 7AMD Radeon Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Ryzen 5 5600G.

PCIe version3.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 10.17
Ryzen 5 5600G 12.51
+23%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 16162
Ryzen 5 5600G 19872
+23%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 1565
Ryzen 5 5600G 1939
+23.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 6110
Ryzen 5 5600G 7722
+26.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.17 12.51
Recency 21 July 2020 13 April 2021

Ryzen 5 5600G has a 23% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 months.

The Ryzen 5 5600G is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Ryzen 5 5600G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Ryzen 5 5600G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1609 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 9015 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5600G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G or Ryzen 5 5600G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.