Processor U300E vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Processor U300E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1324 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | no data |
Power efficiency | 27.84 | no data |
Architecture codename | Picasso (2019−2022) | Raptor Lake-U (2023) |
Release date | 8 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Processor U300E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 5 (Penta-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 6 |
Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
Multiplier | 21 | no data |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 209.78 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 4940 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Processor U300E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FP5 | Intel BGA 1744 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Processor U300E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Processor U300E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Processor U300E are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Processor U300E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Intel UHD Graphics 48EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Processor U300E.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 12 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 8 April 2019 | 4 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 4 | 5 |
Threads | 8 | 6 |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U has 33.3% more threads.
Processor U300E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 25% more physical cores, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Processor U300E. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Processor U300E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.