FX-8100 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
5.39
+104%

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE outperforms FX-8100 by a whopping 104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and FX-8100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11831731
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency14.102.54
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)12 October 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and FX-8100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier33no data
L1 cache384 KB384 KB
L2 cache2 MB8 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm32 nm
Die size210 mm2315 mm2
Number of transistors4940 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and FX-8100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and FX-8100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and FX-8100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and FX-8100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and FX-8100.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE 5.39
+104%
FX-8100 2.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE 8285
+104%
FX-8100 4055

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE 1109
+170%
FX-8100 411

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE 3334
+83.3%
FX-8100 1819

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.39 2.64
Recency 30 September 2019 12 October 2011
Physical cores 4 8
Chip lithography 12 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE has a 104.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

FX-8100, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and FX-8100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
AMD FX-8100
FX-8100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 49 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 62 votes

Rate FX-8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE or FX-8100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.