EPYC 7502 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
4.36
EPYC 7502
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
29.65
+580%

EPYC 7502 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE by a whopping 580% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1448174
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.77
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency5.276.96
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesTSMC
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date30 September 2019 (6 years ago)7 August 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,600

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and EPYC 7502 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads864
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.35 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier3325
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size210 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors4,940 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and EPYC 7502 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and EPYC 7502. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and EPYC 7502 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and EPYC 7502. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and EPYC 7502.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE 4.36
EPYC 7502 29.65
+580%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE 7656
Samples: 309
EPYC 7502 52107
+581%
Samples: 9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.36 29.65
Recency 30 September 2019 7 August 2019
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 8 64
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 180 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE has an age advantage of 1 month, and 414.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7502, on the other hand, has a 580% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7502 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is a desktop processor while EPYC 7502 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
AMD EPYC 7502
EPYC 7502

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 55 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 12 votes

Rate EPYC 7502 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and EPYC 7502, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.