Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE outperforms Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 by a whopping 1221% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1455 | 3298 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | 2x AMD Athlon 64 |
| Power efficiency | 5.27 | 0.70 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Picasso (2019−2022) | Tyler (2007−2009) |
| Release date | 30 September 2019 (6 years ago) | 1 November 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | no data | 1600 MHz |
| Multiplier | 33 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 0 MB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | AM4 | Socket S1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 20 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP), MMX, PowerNow, SSE3,-64, Enhanced 3DNow |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.36 | 0.33 |
| Recency | 30 September 2019 | 1 November 2009 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 20 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE has a 1221.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42, on the other hand, has 75% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is a desktop processor while Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
