To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.
Intel Core i7-4930K vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
General info
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i7-4930K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating | 797 | 786 |
Value for money | 5.43 | 3.76 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | no data |
Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2020) | Ivy Bridge-E (2013) |
Release date | 30 September 2019 (3 years old) | 1 September 2013 (9 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $670 |
Current price | $643 | $152 (0.2x MSRP) |
Technical specs
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i7-4930K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 12 |
Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 12 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 22 nm |
Die size | no data | 257 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 67 °C |
Number of transistors | 4940 Million | 1,860 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Unlocked multiplier | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i7-4930K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | Socket AM4 | FCLGA2011 |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i7-4930K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
Smart Response | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i7-4930K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Identity Protection | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i7-4930K are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | no data |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i7-4930K. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i7-4930K.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | 40 |
Benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 67%
Core i7-4930K outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G by 2% in Passmark.
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i7-4930K. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | no data | 21 Mh/s |
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating | 7.42 | 7.56 |
Recency | 30 September 2019 | 1 September 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 4200 | 3900 |
Base clock speed | 3700 | 3400 |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 22 nm |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technical City couldn't decide between
and
The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i7-4930K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G by Intel
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G by Intel is Core i5-8400, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 3 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest Intel rivals to Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G:
Competitors of Core i7-4930K by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i7-4930K from AMD is Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 2 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core i7-4930K:
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.