i5-8550 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i5-8550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1125 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | Intel Core i5 |
| Power efficiency | 8.33 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 30 September 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 September 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i5-8550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 37 | no data |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 9 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 126 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4940 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i5-8550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Socket AM4 | 1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i5-8550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i5-8550 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i5-8550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i5-8550.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 5.47 | 3.09 |
| Recency | 30 September 2019 | 1 September 2018 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has 77% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 33.3% more threads, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
i5-8550, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i5-8550. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core i5-8550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
