7 160UL vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core 7 160UL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1125 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 8.34 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) |
| Release date | 30 September 2019 (5 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core 7 160UL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Multiplier | 37 | no data |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 4940 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core 7 160UL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Socket AM4 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core 7 160UL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core 7 160UL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core 7 160UL are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core 7 160UL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core 7 160UL.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 September 2019 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 10 |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
7 160UL has an age advantage of 4 years, 150% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core 7 160UL. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Core 7 160UL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
