EPYC 9255 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and EPYC 9255 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1112not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Architecture codenameno dataTurin (2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,495

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and EPYC 9255 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads848
Base clock speedno data3.25 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.8 GHz
L1 cache384 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4096 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data4x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,260 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and EPYC 9255 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and EPYC 9255. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and EPYC 9255 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and EPYC 9255. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and EPYC 9255.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 48
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 200 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G has 207.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9255, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and EPYC 9255. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G is a notebook processor while EPYC 9255 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and EPYC 9255, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
AMD EPYC 9255
EPYC 9255

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 80 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9255 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G or EPYC 9255, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.