A10-7860K vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.82
+181%
A10-7860K
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.07

Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G outperforms A10-7860K by a whopping 181% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and A10-7860K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11271901
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data3.01
Architecture codenameno dataGodaveri (2014−2016)
Release dateno data2 February 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and A10-7860K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4 GHz
L1 cache384 KB256 KB
L2 cache2048 KB4096 KB
L3 cache4096 KBno data
Chip lithography12 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data245 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and A10-7860K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketAM4FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and A10-7860K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and A10-7860K are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and A10-7860K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3-2133
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data512
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and A10-7860K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and A10-7860K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and A10-7860K.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G 5.82
+181%
A10-7860K 2.07

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G 9244
+181%
A10-7860K 3284

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.82 2.07
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm

Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G has a 181.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-7860K in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G is a notebook processor while A10-7860K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and A10-7860K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
AMD A10-7860K
A10-7860K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 80 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 62 votes

Rate A10-7860K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G or A10-7860K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.