Ryzen 7 3700U vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
2017
4 cores / 8 threads
4.27
Ryzen 7 3700U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads
4.60
+7.7%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U by 8% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and Ryzen 7 3700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12641198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Picasso-U (Zen+)
Release date26 October 2017 (6 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$611 $625

Technical specs

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and Ryzen 7 3700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size246 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors4500 Million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and Ryzen 7 3700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP5FP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and Ryzen 7 3700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and Ryzen 7 3700U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and Ryzen 7 3700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)AMD Radeon RX Vega 10

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and Ryzen 7 3700U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1212

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 4.27
Ryzen 7 3700U 4.60
+7.7%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U by 8% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 6660
Ryzen 7 3700U 7174
+7.7%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U by 8% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 889
+0.7%
Ryzen 7 3700U 883

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by 1% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 2550
+0.1%
Ryzen 7 3700U 2548

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 4349
Ryzen 7 3700U 4411
+1.4%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U by 1% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 14336
Ryzen 7 3700U 15461
+7.8%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U by 8% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 5635
+22.6%
Ryzen 7 3700U 4595

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by 23% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 12.36
+9.1%
Ryzen 7 3700U 13.48

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U by 9% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 6
Ryzen 7 3700U 8
+25%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U by 25% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 553
Ryzen 7 3700U 672
+21.5%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U by 22% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 134
Ryzen 7 3700U 139
+3.7%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U by 4% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 1.55
Ryzen 7 3700U 1.59
+2.6%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U by 3% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3.4
Ryzen 7 3700U 3.8
+11.8%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U by 12% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 2700
+12.9%
Ryzen 7 3700U 2392

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by 13% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 98
Ryzen 7 3700U 105
+7.3%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U by 7% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 34
+25.1%
Ryzen 7 3700U 27

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by 25% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3326
+10.8%
Ryzen 7 3700U 3003

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by 11% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 12422
+21.3%
Ryzen 7 3700U 10238

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by 21% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 11156
+11.3%
Ryzen 7 3700U 10025

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by 11% in Geekbench 2.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 9760
+7%
Ryzen 7 3700U 9117

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by 7% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3480
+7.2%
Ryzen 7 3700U 3247

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by 7% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 4.27 4.60
Integrated graphics card 4.49 4.24
Recency 26 October 2017 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and Ryzen 7 3700U. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and Ryzen 7 3700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
Ryzen 7 3700U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 82 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1357 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U or Ryzen 7 3700U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.