Atom C3508 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
3.73
+259%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Atom C3508 by a whopping 259% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16162645
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Atom
Power efficiency10.593.93
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2019)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date8 January 2019 (6 years ago)15 August 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and Atom C3508 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplier2016
L1 cache96 KB (per core)224 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistors4950 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and Atom C3508 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP5FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt11.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and Atom C3508. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and Atom C3508 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and Atom C3508 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and Atom C3508. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4: 1866
Maximum memory size32 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s29.871 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and Atom C3508.

PCIe version3.03
PCI Express lanes128
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data8
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3.73
+259%
Atom C3508 1.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 6585
+260%
Samples: 356
Atom C3508 1831
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.73 1.04
Recency 8 January 2019 15 August 2017
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 11 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U has a 258.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more threads.

Atom C3508, on the other hand, has 36.4% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom C3508 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is a notebook processor while Atom C3508 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Intel Atom C3508
Atom C3508

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 143 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and Atom C3508, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.