Apple M3 Max 14-Core vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.37
Apple M3 Max 14-Core
2023
14 cores / 14 threads, 78 Watt
22.98
+328%

Apple M3 Max 14-Core outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G by a whopping 328% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and M3 Max 14-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1171226
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.91no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Apple M3
Power efficiency7.8127.86
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)no data
Release date12 February 2018 (6 years ago)30 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and M3 Max 14-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads814
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.748 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.06 GHz
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size210 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,950 million92000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and M3 Max 14-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt78 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and M3 Max 14-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and M3 Max 14-Core are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and M3 Max 14-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and M3 Max 14-Core.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 5.37
Apple M3 Max 14-Core 22.98
+328%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 8537
Apple M3 Max 14-Core 36505
+328%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.37 22.98
Recency 12 February 2018 30 October 2023
Physical cores 4 14
Threads 8 14
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 78 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has 20% lower power consumption.

Apple M3 Max 14-Core, on the other hand, has a 327.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 250% more physical cores and 75% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The M3 Max 14-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is a desktop processor while Apple M3 Max 14-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Apple M3 Max 14-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Apple M3 Max 14-Core
M3 Max 14-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 181 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 67 votes

Rate M3 Max 14-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G or M3 Max 14-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.