Xeon W-11865MLE vs Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 outperforms Xeon W-11865MLE by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 784 | 974 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 11.62 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Series | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 38.73 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 26 August 2021 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $467 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Xeon W-11865MLE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.9 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 190 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Xeon W-11865MLE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2 | Intel BGA 1787 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 MB + 16 MB | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Xeon W-11865MLE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Xeon W-11865MLE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Xeon W-11865MLE are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Xeon W-11865MLE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 740M ( - 2800 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics 750 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Xeon W-11865MLE.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.28 | 9.03 |
| Integrated graphics card | 7.22 | 4.11 |
| Recency | 6 January 2025 | 26 August 2021 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 25 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 has a 24.9% higher aggregate performance score, 75.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon W-11865MLE, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon W-11865MLE in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-11865MLE is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
