Ryzen 5 40 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 outperforms Ryzen 5 40 by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 785 | 1296 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 40.90 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) | Mendocino (2025) |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 1 October 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Ryzen 5 40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.9 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 100 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Ryzen 5 40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2 | FT6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 MB + 16 MB | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Ryzen 5 40. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Ryzen 5 40 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Ryzen 5 40. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 740M ( - 2800 MHz) | AMD Radeon 610M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Ryzen 5 40.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.26 | 5.71 |
| Integrated graphics card | 7.28 | 2.76 |
| Recency | 6 January 2025 | 1 October 2025 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 has a 97.2% higher aggregate performance score, 163.8% faster integrated GPU, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 40, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 40 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
