Processor N50 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 215

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 215
6 cores / 12 threads, 28 Watt
10.21
+559%

Ryzen 5 PRO 215 outperforms Processor N50 by a whopping 559% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9232361
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency15.3910.90
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameHawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release dateno data3 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Ryzen 5 PRO 215 and Processor N50: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno data10 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 215 and Processor N50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataIntel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 215 and Processor N50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 PRO 215 and Processor N50 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 215 and Processor N50 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 215 and Processor N50. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 215 and Processor N50.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.21 1.55
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 215 has a 559% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Processor N50, on the other hand, has 367% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor N50 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 215 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 6 votes

Rate Processor N50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 PRO 215 and Processor N50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.