AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 vs Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Xeon E5-1650 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Xeon E5-1650 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Xeon E5-1650 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Xeon E5-1650 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Xeon E5-1650 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Xeon E5-1650 v3 are enumerated here.
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Xeon E5-1650 v3. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Xeon E5-1650 v3.
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Xeon E5-1650 v3. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Let's see how good Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Xeon E5-1650 v3 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately. Also, your gaming PC must have a decent enough GPU to perform well.
Both CPUs satisfy the 100% minimum and 99% recommended requirements of all games known to us.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
0.6% better performance in benchmarks
Much newer (29 June 2017 vs 1 July 2014)
Cheaper ($164 vs $169)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 22 nm)
Lower power consumption (65W vs 140W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.
AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions - a set of SIMD instructions working with 128- and 256-bit registers)
AVX2 (Advanced Vector Extensions 2 - an extension to AVX, the set of SIMD instructions working with 128- and 256-bit registers)
AES (Advanced Encryption Standard instructions set - hardware acceleration of AES encryption and decryption. Speeds up encryption software, e.g. Veracrypt)
x86-64 (a general name for 64-bit extension of x86 instruction set. There are AMD64 and Intel 64 versions that differ very little)
Virtualization (Hardware acceleration of virtual machines)
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
Thermal Monitoring Technologies
So, which one is the better CPU?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Xeon E5-1650 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.