Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen AI Max 385 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1006 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | no data |
Power efficiency | 10.28 | no data |
Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Strix Halo (2025) |
Release date | 29 June 2017 (7 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen AI Max 385 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 12 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 5 GHz |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 32 | no data |
L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 32 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen AI Max 385 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | AM4 | FP11 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen AI Max 385. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen AI Max 385 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen AI Max 385. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | - | Radeon 8050S |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen AI Max 385.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 29 June 2017 | 6 January 2025 |
Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
Threads | 12 | 16 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 55 Watt |
Ryzen AI Max 385 has an age advantage of 7 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 18.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen AI Max 385. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI Max 385 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen AI Max 385, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.